Fully Automatic Quantitative Measurement of 18F-FDG PET/CT in Thymic Epithelial Tumors Using a Convolutional Neural Network.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35675135.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004146.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning (DL)-based segmentation algorithm for automatic measurement of metabolic parameters of 18F-FDG PET/CT in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs), comparable performance to manual volumes of interest. A total of 186 consecutive patients with resectable TETs and preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively enrolled (145 thymomas, 41 thymic carcinomas). A quasi-3D U-net architecture was trained to resemble ground-truth volumes of interest. Segmentation performance was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient. Agreements between manual and DL-based automated extraction of SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and 63 radiomics features were evaluated via concordance correlation coefficients (CCCs) and linear regression slopes. Diagnostic and prognostic values were compared in terms of area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) for thymic carcinoma and hazards ratios (HRs) for freedom from recurrence. The mean Dice similarity coefficient was 0.83 ± 0.34. Automatically measured SUVmax (slope, 0.97; CCC, 0.92), MTV (slope, 0.94; CCC, 0.96), and TLG (slope, 0.96; CCC, 0.96) were in good agreement with manual measurements. The mean CCC and slopes were 0.88 ± 0.06 and 0.89 ± 0.05, respectively, for the radiomics parameters. Automatically measured SUVmax, MTV, and TLG showed good diagnostic accuracy for thymic carcinoma (AUCs: SUVmax, 0.95; MTV, 0.85; TLG, 0.87) and significant prognostic value (HRs: SUVmax, 1.31 [95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.48]; MTV, 2.11 [1.09-4.06]; TLG, 1.90 [1.12-3.23]). No significant differences in the AUCs or HRs were found between automatic and manual measurements for any of the metabolic parameters. Our DL-based model provides comparable segmentation performance and metabolic parameter values to manual measurements in TETs.
Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Thymoma
- Thymus Neoplasms