Can Diffusion Tensor Imaging Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Diagnose Carpal Tunnel Syndrome? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35695339.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/15589447221096706 and PMC identifier 9896277.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) can detect microstructural changes in peripheral nerves. Studies have reported that the median nerve apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), a quantification of water molecule diffusion direction, is sensitive in diagnosing carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Five databases were searched for studies using ADC to investigate CTS. Apparent diffusion coefficient (measured in mm<sup>2</sup>/s) were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. Twenty-two studies met criteria yielding 592 patients with CTS and 414 controls. Median nerve ADC were measured at the level of the distal radioulnar joint (CTS ADC: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.07-1.15, I<sup>2</sup> = 54%; control ADC: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, I<sup>2</sup> = 57%), pisiform (CTS ADC: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.37-1.42, I<sup>2</sup> = 0%; control ADC: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.23-1.31, I<sup>2</sup> = 59%), hamate (CTS ADC: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.36-1.43, I<sup>2</sup> = 58%; control ADC: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.25-1.28, I<sup>2</sup> = 47%), and as an combination of several measurements (CTS ADC: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.37-1.47, I<sup>2</sup> = 100%; control ADC: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.53, I<sup>2</sup> = 100%). Median nerve ADC is decreased in individuals with CTS compared to controls at the levels of the hamate and pisiform. ADC cut-offs to diagnose CTS should be established according to these anatomic levels and can be improved through additional studies that include use of a wrist coil.
Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Anatomy
- wrist
- hand