Adoption of Single-Use Clean Intermittent Catheterization Policies Does Not Appear to Affect Genitourinary Outcomes in a Large Spinal Cord Injury Cohort.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35748685.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/JU.0000000000002836.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In April 2008, Medicare amended its policy for clean intermittent catheterization, increasing coverage from 4 reused catheters per month to up to 200 single-use catheters. The primary reason for the policy change was an assumed decrease in risk of urinary tract infection with single-use catheters. Given its economic/environmental impact (∼50-fold increase in cost and plastic waste) and a paucity of supporting evidence, we retrospectively evaluate the policy's effect in a prospective spinal cord injury registry. We accessed data for the years 1995 to 2020 from the National Spinal Cord Injury Database focusing on 1-year follow-up in those unable to volitionally void after injury. We asked 2 questions: (1) Did hospitalizations for genitourinary reasons decrease after the clean intermittent catheterization policy change?; and (2) Did clean intermittent catheterization adoption and adherence increase after the clean intermittent catheterization policy change? During the study period, 2,657 of the 6,843 (38.8%) participants unable to volitionally void after spinal cord injury were hospitalized during their first follow-up year. Of the cohort performing clean intermittent catheterization, fewer individuals were hospitalized for genitourinary reasons prior to the clean intermittent catheterization policy change compared to after (10.6% vs 14.6%, <i>P</i> < .001), a finding that persisted on multivariate logistic regression (odds radio, 0.67, <i>P</i> < .001). In addition, the number of individuals performing clean intermittent catheterization at 1-year follow-up was less after the policy change compared to prior (57.0% vs 59.1%, <i>P</i> = .044). Our findings suggest the 2008 policy change shifting clean intermittent catheterization coverage from catheter reuse to single-use did not decrease hospitalizations for urinary tract infection or increase clean intermittent catheterization uptake in individuals with spinal cord injury.
Medical subject headings
- Intermittent Urethral Catheterization
- Spinal Cord Injuries
- Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic
- Urinary Tract Infections