Plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures for delayed union and non-union is a cost-effective intervention but functional deficits persist at long-term follow-up.

Fox, Ben; Clement, Nicholas David; MacDonald, Deborah J; Robinson, Michael; Nicholson, Jamie A · Shoulder Elbow · 2022

retrospective_cohort · Level III

Where this comes from

Abstract

The primary aim of this study was to compare the long-term functional outcome of midshaft clavicle fracture fixation for delayed (≥3 month) and non-union (≥6 month) compared to a matched cohort of patients that achieved union with non-operative management. The secondary aim was to assess cost-effectiveness of fixation. A consecutive series of patients over 10-years were retrospectively reviewed using the QuickDASH, Oxford Shoulder Score and EuroQol five-dimension summary index (EQ-5D). These patients were compared to a matched cohort that achieved union after non-operative management using propensity score matching. Sixty patients (follow-up 79%, <i>n</i> = 60/76) at 4.1 years post-operative (1.1-10.0 years) had a QuickDASH of 16.5 (95% CI 11.6-21.5), Oxford Shoulder Score 41.5 (39.0-44.1) and EQ-5D 0.7621 (0.6822-0.8421). One in five patients were dissatisfied with their final outcome (<i>n</i> = 13/60). Functional outcome was inferior following fixation when compared to patients that united with non-operative management (QuickDASH 16.5 vs. 5.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and EQ-5D 0.7621 vs. 0.9073, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, significant improvements were found when compared to pre-operative scores (QuickDASH <i>p</i> < 0.001 and EQ-5D <i>p</i> < 0.001). The cost per QALY for fixation was £5624.62 for the study cohort. Clavicle fixation for delayed and non-union is a cost-effective intervention but outcomes are worse compared to patients that unite with non-operative management.

Anatomy