Plate fixation of midshaft clavicle fractures for delayed union and non-union is a cost-effective intervention but functional deficits persist at long-term follow-up.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35846398.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/1758573221990367 and PMC identifier 9284296.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The primary aim of this study was to compare the long-term functional outcome of midshaft clavicle fracture fixation for delayed (≥3 month) and non-union (≥6 month) compared to a matched cohort of patients that achieved union with non-operative management. The secondary aim was to assess cost-effectiveness of fixation. A consecutive series of patients over 10-years were retrospectively reviewed using the QuickDASH, Oxford Shoulder Score and EuroQol five-dimension summary index (EQ-5D). These patients were compared to a matched cohort that achieved union after non-operative management using propensity score matching. Sixty patients (follow-up 79%, <i>n</i> = 60/76) at 4.1 years post-operative (1.1-10.0 years) had a QuickDASH of 16.5 (95% CI 11.6-21.5), Oxford Shoulder Score 41.5 (39.0-44.1) and EQ-5D 0.7621 (0.6822-0.8421). One in five patients were dissatisfied with their final outcome (<i>n</i> = 13/60). Functional outcome was inferior following fixation when compared to patients that united with non-operative management (QuickDASH 16.5 vs. 5.5, <i>p</i> < 0.001 and EQ-5D 0.7621 vs. 0.9073, <i>p</i> = 0.001). However, significant improvements were found when compared to pre-operative scores (QuickDASH <i>p</i> < 0.001 and EQ-5D <i>p</i> < 0.001). The cost per QALY for fixation was £5624.62 for the study cohort. Clavicle fixation for delayed and non-union is a cost-effective intervention but outcomes are worse compared to patients that unite with non-operative management.
Anatomy
- clavicle