Home-Based Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Enhance Cognition in Stroke: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Ko, Myoung-Hwan; Yoon, Ju-Yul; Jo, Yun-Ju; Son, Mi-Nam; Kim, Da-Sol; Kim, Gi-Wook; Won, Yu Hui; Park, Sung-Hee et al. · Stroke · 2022

rct · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising tool for improving poststroke cognitive function. Home-based rehabilitation is increasingly required for patients with stroke, and additional benefits are expected if supplemented with remotely supervised tDCS (RS-tDCS). We evaluated the cognitive improvement effect and feasibility of RS-tDCS in patients with chronic stroke. Twenty-six patients with chronic stroke and cognitive impairment (Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [K-MoCA] score <26) were randomized into real and sham RS-tDCS groups and underwent concurrent computerized cognitive training and RS-tDCS. Patients and caregivers underwent training to ensure correct tDCS self-application, were monitored, and treated 5 d/wk for 4 weeks. We investigated several cognition tests including K-MoCA, Korean version of the Dementia Rating Scale-2, Korean-Boston Naming Test, Trail Making Test, Go/No Go, and Controlled Oral Word Association Test at the end of the training sessions and one month later. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used for comparison between the groups and within each group. The adherence rate of the appropriate RS-tDCS session was also investigated. In within-group comparison, unlike the sham group, the real group showed significant improvement in K-MoCA (<i>P</i><sub>real</sub>=0.004 versus <i>P</i><sub>sham</sub>=0.132), particularly in patients with lower baseline K-MoCA (K-MoCA<sub>10-17</sub>; <i>P</i><sub>real</sub>=0.001 versus <i>P</i><sub>sham</sub>=0.835, K-MoCA<sub>18-25</sub>; <i>P</i><sub>real</sub>=0.060 versus <i>P</i><sub>sham</sub>=0.064) or with left hemispheric lesions (left; <i>P</i><sub>real</sub>=0.010 versus <i>P</i><sub>sham</sub>=0.454, right; <i>P</i><sub>real</sub>=0.106 versus <i>P</i><sub>sham</sub>=0.128). In between-group comparison, a significant difference was observed in K-MoCA in the lower baseline K-MoCA subgroup (K-MoCA<sub>10-17</sub>; <i>P</i><sub>time×group</sub>=0.048), but no significant difference was found in other cognitive tests. The adherence rate of successful application of the RS-tDCS was 98.4%, and no serious adverse effects were detected. RS-tDCS is a safe and feasible rehabilitation modality for poststroke cognitive dysfunction. Specifically, RS-tDCS is effective in patients with moderate cognitive decline. Additionally, these data demonstrate the potential to enhance home-based cognitive training, although significant differences were not consistently found in between-group comparisons; therefore, further larger studies are needed. URL: https://cris.nih.go.kr; Unique identifier: KCT0003427.

Medical subject headings