Metabolic syndrome in primary care: A latent variable analysis of electronic medical records.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36058826.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.pcd.2022.08.007.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The best definition of the metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) remains controversial. The aim was to develop a latent variable measurement model for the MetSyn using primary care data. This retrospective case-control study was based on the data from the IQVIA Disease Analyzer (DA) database including a representative panel of general and internal medicine practices in Germany. 23,020 adult patients, who were newly diagnosed with ≥1 component of the MetSyn (cases; median age [IQR]: 60 [50-72] years; 54 % males) between January 2016 to December 2019, and 2,144 patients without any MetSyn component (controls; 48 [38-61] years; 45 % males) were included. MetSyn was modeled by ICD-10 codes (E66: obesity, I10: hypertension, E11: type 2 diabetes, E78: lipid disorders) and physiological measures (BMI, HbA1c, blood pressure, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglycerides). The covariance structure of the ICD codes and physiological measures could not be accounted for by a single MetSyn factor (root mean square error of approximation, RMSEA=0.085). Enrichment by another factor "Likelihood to Diagnose" significantly increased model fit with the observed data (RMSEA=0.054). "Likelihood to Diagnose" hardly correlated with MetSyn (r = 0.06), and was differentially associated with male sex, older age, and corresponding cardio- and cerebrovascular diseases. MetSyn showed the highest loading on four subordinate factors "hyperlipidemia" (0.70), "obesity" (0.66), "type 2 diabetes" (0.60), followed by "hypertension" (0.42). The ICD codes E66 and E78 were less indicative of these factors relative to BMI and triglycerides/HDL-cholesterol, respectively, whereas E11 and I10 were similarly indicative as their corresponding physiological measures. MetSyn was best indicated by BMI, triglycerides (an indirect marker of insulin sensitivity), HbA1c, and ICD-10 diagnosis E11 (type 2 diabetes). The factor "Likelihood to diagnose" probably constitutes a method factor of differential diagnosis systematically contributing to the common consistency of the MetSyn diagnosis in primary care.
Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
- Hypertension
- Metabolic Syndrome