Comparative Analysis between Side-to-End and End-to-End Lymphaticovenous Anastomosis for Secondary Lower Limb Lymphedema.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36067467.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009647.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this retrospective study was to describe, evaluate, and compare the outcome between end-to-end and side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomoses for all stages of lymphedema. A total of 123 patients were divided into the end-to-end ( n = 63) or the side-to-end ( n = 60) group. The demographics and intraoperative and postoperative findings were evaluated. In addition, subcategory evaluation was performed for early- and advanced-phase lymphedema. The demographic findings were insignificant. The intraoperative findings showed a significantly higher number of lymphaticovenous anastomoses performed for the end-to-end group (4.1 ± 1.7) over the side-to-end group (3.2 ± 1.2) ( p < 0.001), whereas the number of different lymphatic vessels used per patient was not significant (3.4 ± 1.4 versus 3.2 ± 1.2; p = 0.386). The diameter of the lymphatic vessels was not significant (0.43 ± 0.06 mm versus 0.45 ± 0.09 mm; p = 0.136). Although both groups showed significant postoperative volume reduction, the side-to-end group had a significantly better reduction in all time intervals ( p < 0.03) and longitudinal outcome ( p = 0.004). However, the subcategory evaluation for early-phase patients showed no difference between the two groups, but a significantly better volume reduction ratio was noted for the side-to-end group at all time intervals ( p < 0.025) in addition to overall longitudinal outcome ( p = 0.004) in advanced lymphedema patients. This is the first study to report the efficacy of end-to-end versus side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomosis in different phases of lymphedema. Although both end-to-end and side-to-end lymphaticovenous anastomoses are significantly effective in volume reduction, there was a significantly better reduction for the side-to-end group in advanced-phase lymphedema patients with stage II late and stage III disease, whereas no difference was noted for early-phase lymphedema patients. Therapeutic, III.
Medical subject headings
- Microsurgery
- Lymphedema