Comparative outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation, the conventional method and navigation assistance in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: A prospective comparative study with a two-year follow up.

Abstract

To compare and analyze the correction precision, clinical outcomes and complications among the three methods of performing open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO), including patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), conventional method and navigation assistance. In this prospective, single-center study, we randomly assigned patients with knee osteoarthritis in a 1:1:1 ratio to undergo Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) with conventional method, navigation assistance or PSI. The primary outcome was the target/observed hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle difference at 1 month postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were changes in the postoperative posterior tibial slope (PTS) at 1 month and clinical outcomes including knee pain on a visual analogue scale (ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more severe pain), Lysholm and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (ranging from 0 to 240) scores at 1 month, 6 months, 12 months, and 24 months. From 2017 through 2019, a total of 608 patients were screened; of those patients, 144 were enrolled, with 48 in each group. The primary outcome of the HKA difference was 2.6 ± 2.0° in the conventional group, 2.3 ± 1.5° in the navigation group and 0.6 ± 1.0° in the PSI group (P < 0.001). Secondary outcomes including changes in the postoperative PTS and clinical outcomes at 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months were in the same direction as the primary outcome. There were no significant differences in the complications among the three groups. In the present study, none of the three methods showed superiority in objective correction precision and clinical outcomes at 2 years.