Association of long and short interpregnancy intervals with maternal outcomes.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36119251.
- Also identified by DOI 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2231_21 and PMC identifier 9480788.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-SA.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Interpregnancy interval (IPI) is spacing between live birth and beginning a new pregnancy. Both long and short IPIs have been associated with adverse maternal outcomes. There is paucity in the Indian literature regarding the impact of IPI on maternal outcomes. The cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, from July 2019 to June 2020. Women with previous abortions, previous stillbirth, nulliparity, or multiple pregnancies were excluded. A pre-structured pro forma was used for demographic details. IPI was categorized as <6 months, 6 to <24 months, 24 to <60 months, and 60 months. Maternal outcomes were studied, and odds ratios were calculated. There were 6984 deliveries in the period. A total of 4812 women were enrolled after following the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Of 4812 women, 142 (2.9%) had IPI <6 months, 3336/4812 women (69.3%) had IPI 6 to <24 months, 1144/4812 women (23.7%) had IPI 24 to <60 months, and 3.9% women (190/4812) had IPI ≥60 months. High risk of fetal malposition (OR 3.84), fetal growth restriction (OR 2.06), and hypertension (OR 1.86) were seen in women with short IPI <6 months. Women with longer IPI (≥ 60 months) had higher chances of preterm labor (OR 3.82), oligoamnios (OR 2.54), gestational diabetes (OR 2.19), and anemia (OR 1.45). Three-fourths of women had IPI less than 24 months recommended as minimum interval by WHO. Efforts are needed to increase awareness and availability of contraceptive choices for postpartum women to ensure adequate spacing.