An online adaptive plan library approach for intensity modulated proton therapy for head and neck cancer.

Oud, Michelle; Breedveld, Sebastiaan; Giżyńska, Marta; Kroesen, Michiel; Hutschemaekers, Stefan; Habraken, Steven; Petit, Steven; Perkó, Zoltán et al. · Radiother Oncol · 2022

case_series · Level IV

Where this comes from

Abstract

In intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), the impact of setup errors and anatomical changes is commonly mitigated by robust optimization with population-based setup robustness (SR) settings and offline replanning. In this study we propose and evaluate an alternative approach based on daily plan selection from patient-specific pre-treatment established plan libraries (PLs). Clinical implementation of the PL strategy would be rather straightforward compared to daily online re-planning. For 15 head-and-neck cancer patients, the planning CT was used to generate a PL with 5 plans, robustly optimized for increasing SR: 0, 1, 2, 3, 5 mm, and 3% range robustness. Repeat CTs (rCTs) and realistic setup and range uncertainty distributions were used for simulation of treatment courses for the PL approach, treatments with fixed SR (fSR<sub>3</sub>) and a trigger-based offline adaptive schedule for 3 mm SR (fSR<sub>3</sub>OfA). Daily plan selection in the PL approach was based only on recomputed dose to the CTV on the rCT. Compared to using fSR<sub>3</sub> and fSR<sub>3</sub>OfA, the risk of xerostomia grade ≥ II & III and dysphagia ≥ grade III were significantly reduced with the PL. For 6/15 patients the risk of xerostomia and/or dysphagia ≥ grade II could be reduced by > 2% by using PL. For the other patients, adherence to target coverage constraints was often improved. fSR<sub>3</sub>OfA resulted in significantly improved coverage compared to PL for selected patients. The proposed PL approach resulted in overall reduced NTCPs compared to fSR<sub>3</sub> and fSR<sub>3</sub>OfA at limited cost in target coverage.

Medical subject headings