Flux coupling, not specificity, shapes the transport and phylogeny of SLC6 glycine transporters.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36191186.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1073/pnas.2205874119 and PMC identifier 9564218.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
ATB[Formula: see text] (<i>SLC6A14</i>) is a member of the amino acid transporter branch of the SLC6 family along with GlyT1 (<i>SLC6A9</i>) and GlyT2 (<i>SLC6A5</i>), two glycine-specific transporters coupled to 2:1 and 3:1 Na[Formula: see text]:Cl[Formula: see text], respectively. In contrast, ATB[Formula: see text] exhibits broad substrate specificity for all neutral and cationic amino acids, and its ionic coupling remains unsettled. Using the reversal potential slope method, we demonstrate a 3:1:1 Na[Formula: see text]:Cl[Formula: see text]:Gly stoichiometry for ATB[Formula: see text] that is consistent with its 2.1 <i>e</i>/Gly charge coupling. Like GlyT2, ATB[Formula: see text] behaves as a unidirectional transporter with virtually no glycine efflux at negative potentials after uptake, except by heteroexchange as remarkably shown by leucine activation of NMDARs in <i>Xenopus</i> oocytes coexpressing both membrane proteins. Analysis and computational modeling of the charge movement of ATB[Formula: see text] reveal a higher affinity for sodium in the absence of substrate than GlyT2 and a gating mechanism that locks Na[Formula: see text] into the apo-transporter at depolarized potentials. A 3:1 Na[Formula: see text]:Cl[Formula: see text] stoichiometry justifies the concentrative transport properties of ATB[Formula: see text] and explains its trophic role in tumor growth, while rationalizing its phylogenetic proximity to GlyT2 despite their extreme divergence in specificity.
Medical subject headings
- Glycine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
- Sodium