Assessment of Quality of Frozen Section Services at a Large Academic Hospital Before and After Relocation.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36208148.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/ajcp/aqac109.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine outcomes following relocation of frozen section services (FSS) and the implementation of a dedicated gastrointestinal frozen service. We reviewed our FSS 6 months prior to and following FSS relocation. Satisfaction surveys were sent to surgeons and pathologists. Survey feedback resulted in a pilot of gastrointestinal subspecialist frozen section coverage. There were 1,607 and 1,472 specimens from 667 and 602 patients pre- and post-FSS relocation, respectively. There was a decline in median specimen delivery time to pathology (12 vs 10 minutes, P < .001) and an increase in median time from receipt in pathology to intraoperative diagnosis (20 vs 22 minutes, P = .008) in cases with intrapathology consultation but no change without consultation (median, 19 minutes). Intrapathology consultation decreased from 19.7% (317/1,607) to 11.5% (169/1,472) (P < .001). Discordance rates between frozen section and permanent section remained low and similar (2.0% [33/1,607] vs 2.7% [40/1,472], P = .24). There was no significant change in discordance with dedicated gastrointestinal subspecialty frozen section interpretation. Relocation of FSS and dedicated subspecialty interpretation may improve surgeon satisfaction but can also create workflow challenges. Pathology departments need to achieve a balance between satisfaction and adequacy to establish best frozen section coverage models.
Medical subject headings
- Frozen Sections
- Pathology, Surgical