Dislocation in Single-Mobility Versus Dual-Mobility Trapezometacarpal Joint Prostheses.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36214288.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/15589447221124257 and PMC identifier 11067852.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze postoperative dislocation rates in single-mobility (Ivory) versus dual-mobility (Moovis) trapezometacarpal (TMC) joint prostheses. Second, we report complications requiring additional surgery in these 2 types of prostheses. We retrospectively obtained data of all patients receiving a TMC joint prothesis at our hospital between January 2015 and December 2020. We recorded the type of implant used (ie, single vs dual mobility; Ivory vs Moovis), and recorded dislocations and complications requiring additional surgery. We recorded significantly more prosthetic dislocations in the single-mobility (Ivory) group (n = 6, 9.7%), compared with the dual-mobility (Moovis) group (n = 1, 1.4%). The most frequent complication requiring additional surgery was De Quervain tendinitis (n = 13, 9.6%). This study shows that a dual-mobility TMC prosthesis has significantly less postoperative dislocations compared with its single-mobility counterpart. We identity De Quervain tendinitis as the most frequent complication requiring additional surgery.
Medical subject headings
- Carpometacarpal Joints
- Joint Prosthesis
- Joint Dislocations
- Prosthesis Failure
- Prosthesis Design
Anatomy
- hand
- wrist