PET Imaging of Fibroblast Activation Protein in Various Types of Cancer Using <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286: Comparison with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 in a Single-Center, Prospective Study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36215571.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2967/jnumed.122.264544 and PMC identifier 10071807.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
PET imaging that targets fibroblast activation protein (FAP) on the surface of cancer-associated fibroblasts has yielded promising tumor diagnostic results. FAP-2286 contains cyclic peptides as FAP-binding motifs to optimize tumor retention compared with the small-molecule FAP inhibitor (FAPI) series (FAPI-04/46). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 to detect primary and metastatic lesions in patients with various types of cancer, compared with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286. <b>Methods:</b> Sixty-four patients with 15 types of cancer underwent <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT for initial assessment or detection of recurrence. For comparison, 63 patients underwent paired <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and 19 patients underwent paired <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 PET/CT. Lesion uptake was quantified as SUV<sub>max</sub> and tumor-to-background ratio. The Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used to compare SUV<sub>max</sub> between PET modalities, and the McNemar test was used to compare lesion detectability. <b>Results:</b> Uptake of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 was significantly higher than that of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG in primary tumors (median SUV<sub>max</sub>, 11.1 vs. 6.9; <i>P</i> < 0.001), lymph node metastases (median SUV<sub>max</sub>, 10.6 vs. 6.2; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and distant metastases, resulting in improved image contrast and lesion detectability. All primary tumors (46/46) were clearly visualized by <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT, whereas 9 of the 46 lesions could not be visualized by <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT. The lesion detection rate of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 PET/CT was superior to that of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT for involved lymph nodes (98% [105/107] vs. 85% [91/107], <i>P</i> = 0.001) and bone and visceral metastases (95% [162/171] vs. 67% [114/171], <i>P</i> < 0.001). <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 yielded tumor uptake and lesion detection rates similar to those of <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 in a subcohort of 19 patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 is a promising FAP-inhibitor derivative for safe cancer diagnosis, staging, and restaging. It may be a better alternative to <sup>18</sup>F-FDG for the cancer types that exhibit low-to-moderate uptake of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, which include gastric, pancreatic, and hepatic cancers. In addition, <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAP-2286 and <sup>68</sup>Ga-FAPI-46 yielded comparable clinical results.
Medical subject headings
- Quinolines
- Liver Neoplasms
- Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts