Incidence of Cutaneous Adverse Events With Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase Inhibitors as Adjuvant Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36227613.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4327 and PMC identifier 9562095.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway is among the most frequently activated pathways in human cancers. As the use of PI3K inhibitors for cancer treatment grows, there is increasing need for understanding the cutaneous effects associated with these therapies. To systematically review the published literature reporting incidence of cutaneous adverse events with PI3K inhibitors and to provide pooled incidence estimates using meta-analysis. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. The literature search concerned entries through September 2021 in the following sources: PubMed, Cochrane registry, ClinicalTrials.gov, and evidence from the NHS UK and Trip medical database. To analyze PI3K inhibitors' cutaneous adverse events incidence, only randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were considered. The search strategy used the following keywords: (prevalence OR incidence OR epidemiology) and (phosphoinositide 3 kinase inhibitors OR PI3K inhibitors). No language restriction was applied. Analysis was conducted on July 1, 2022. Studies included phase 2 and phase 3 RCTs that reported incidence of cutaneous adverse events associated with use of PI3K inhibitors. Data extracted included sex, medication name and class, sample size, rash incidence, and grade. The bias risk was assessed by the Cochrane tool for risk of bias assessment in RCTs. The primary outcome was incidence of PI3K inhibitor cutaneous adverse events (with 95% CIs) among the overall population and among subgroups. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. The analysis found the incidence of PI3K inhibitor cutaneous events of any grade to be 29.30% in the intervention group, translating to a pooled odds ratio (OR) for incidence of cutaneous adverse events of any grades of 2.55 (95% CI, 1.74-3.75). Incidence of severe grade (grade ≥3) of rash in the intervention group was estimated to be 6.95%, yielding a pooled Peto OR of 4.64 (95% CI, 2.70-7.97). Subgroup analyses revealed that the incidence of severe cutaneous adverse events (grade ≥3) was higher with the use of Pan-class-1 PI3K inhibitors (OR, 6.67; 95% CI, 4.28-10.38) than isoform-selective PI3K inhibitors (OR, 6.37; 95% CI, 3.25-12.48). This systematic review and meta-analysis identified an overall incidence of PI3K inhibitor cutaneous adverse events of any grade to be 29.30% with a pooled OR of 2.55; (95% CI, 1.74-3.75). These findings clarify the risk of cutaneous adverse events associated with this important class of anticancer therapies.