No Difference in Two-Year Revisions Between Hybrid Fusion and Two-Level Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A National Database Study.

Abstract

Retrospective Cohort. This study utilized a large national database to compare two-year revision rates, in addition to complications and costs, of hybrid surgery (HS) compared to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study used the PearlDiver Mariner dataset selecting for patients aged 18 and older who had at least 90-day active longitudinal follow-up who underwent two-level ACDF or two-level Hybrid surgery (single level ACDF and single level CDA). Patients with prior spinal trauma, infection, cancer, or posterior fusion were excluded. Primary outcomes measures were 90-day major and minor medical complications, ED visits, readmissions, as well as two-year revisions. Patients were also assessed for postoperative dysphagia, incidental durotomy, vascular injury, 90-day surgical site, and implant complications. Additionally, hospitalization and postoperative costs were evaluated. There were 4570 two-level ACDF surgeries and 888 hybrid surgeries. After matching the cohorts, no statistical differences in demographics were found. There were no differences in reoperation rates at all measured time points nor 2-year complications. HS had a lower incidence of major (1.6% vs 3.1%, <i>P</i> = .003) and minor complications (3.0% vs 4.6%, <i>P</i> = .009) than ACDF. 90-day readmission was lower in the HS cohort (2.8% vs 4.2%), <i>P</i> = .024. HS was associated with reduced hospitalization costs -$2614 (-$3916 to -$904, <i>P</i> < .001). 3516 patients had ACDF, and 699 had HS with at least 2 years of follow-up. Hybrid surgery is a safe and effective surgical treatment for cervical disease in appropriately selected patients.