Unique problems for the design of the first trials of transplanting porcine kidneys into humans.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36332727.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2022.10.009.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Over the past year, 3 scientific teams conducted experiments of genetically edited porcine organs into human recipients, 3 of whom were deceased and 1 living. In this editorial, we describe challenges for the design of initial xenotransplantation clinical trials and focus on patient selection, consent, and requisite post-transplant follow-up. Given the uncertain clinical benefit of xenotransplantation, we propose that patient selection criteria might include novel elements, such as approaching patients who have a low quality of life and a strong aversion to continued dialysis therapy. We set expectations related to the importance of informing and protecting family members and medical teams who could be exposed to zoonotic viral infection from the donor organ and/or receive unwanted publicity. Meeting these challenges in trial design and oversight will require multidisciplinary expertise, a conceptual model that extends beyond the individual patient, and creative collaboration between scientists and regulatory agencies.
Medical subject headings
- Quality of Life
- Renal Dialysis