Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> relaxation times measurement by 3D magnetic resonance fingerprinting with different dictionary resolutions.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36422648.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-022-09244-x and PMC identifier 10017611.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To assess the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of T<sub>1</sub> and T<sub>2</sub> relaxation time measurements by three-dimensional magnetic resonance fingerprinting (3D MRF) using various dictionary resolutions. The ISMRM/NIST phantom was scanned daily for 10 days in two 3 T MR scanners using a 3D MRF sequence reconstructed using four dictionaries with varying step sizes and one dictionary with wider ranges. Thirty-nine healthy volunteers were enrolled: 20 subjects underwent whole-brain MRF scans in both scanners and the rest in one scanner. ROI/VOI analyses were performed on phantom and brain MRF maps. Accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility metrics were calculated. In the phantom study, all dictionaries showed high T<sub>1</sub> linearity to the reference values (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.99), repeatability (CV < 3%), and reproducibility (CV < 3%) with lower linearity (R<sup>2</sup> > 0.98), repeatability (CV < 6%), and reproducibility (CV ≤ 4%) for T<sub>2</sub> measurement. The volunteer study demonstrated high T<sub>1</sub> reproducibility of within-subject CV (wCV) < 4% by all dictionaries with the same ranges, both in the brain parenchyma and CSF. Yet, reproducibility was moderate for T<sub>2</sub> measurement (wCV < 8%). In CSF measurement, dictionaries with a smaller range showed a seemingly better reproducibility (T<sub>1</sub>, wCV 3%; T<sub>2</sub>, wCV 8%) than the much wider range dictionary (T<sub>1</sub>, wCV 5%; T<sub>2</sub>, wCV 13%). Truncated CSF relaxometry values were evident in smaller range dictionaries. The accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of 3D MRF across various dictionary resolutions were high for T<sub>1</sub> and moderate for T<sub>2</sub> measurements. A lower-resolution dictionary with a well-defined range may be adequate, thus significantly reducing the computational load. • A lower-resolution dictionary with a well-defined range may be sufficient for 3D MRF reconstruction. • CSF relaxation times might be underestimated due to truncation by the upper dictionary range. • Dictionary with a higher upper range might be advisable, especially for CSF evaluation and elderly subjects whose perivascular spaces are more prominent.
Medical subject headings
- Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging