Assessment of epicardial adipose tissue on virtual non-contrast images derived from photon-counting detector coronary CTA datasets.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36462042.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-022-09257-6 and PMC identifier 10017616.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
To assess epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and attenuation of different virtual non-contrast (VNC) reconstructions derived from coronary CTA (CCTA) datasets of a photon-counting detector (PCD) CT-system to replace true non-contrast (TNC) series. Consecutive patients (n = 42) with clinically indicated CCTA and coronary TNC were included. Two VNC series were reconstructed, using a conventional (VNC<sub>Conv</sub>) and a novel calcium-preserving (VNC<sub>PC</sub>) algorithm. EAT was segmented on TNC, VNC<sub>Conv</sub>, VNC<sub>PC</sub>, and CCTA (CTA<sub>-30</sub>) series using thresholds of -190 to -30 HU and an additional segmentation on the CCTA series with an upper threshold of 0 HU (CTA<sub>0</sub>). EAT volumes and their histograms were assessed for each series. Linear regression was used to correlate EAT volumes and the Euclidian distance for histograms. The paired t-test and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to assess differences for parametric and non-parametric data. EAT volumes from VNC and CCTA series showed significant differences compared to TNC (all p < .05), but excellent correlation (all R<sup>2</sup> > 0.9). Measurements on the novel VNC<sub>PC</sub> series showed the best correlation (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.99) and only minor absolute differences compared to TNC values. Mean volume differences were -12%, -3%, -13%, and +10% for VNC<sub>Conv</sub>, VNC<sub>PC</sub>, CTA<sub>-30</sub>, and CTA<sub>0</sub> compared to TNC. Distribution of CT values on VNC<sub>PC</sub> showed less difference to TNC than on VNC<sub>Conv</sub> (mean attenuation difference +7% vs. +2%; Euclidean distance of histograms 0.029 vs. 0.016). VNC<sub>PC</sub>-reconstructions of PCD-CCTA datasets can be used to reliably assess EAT volume with a high accuracy and only minor differences in CT values compared to TNC. Substitution of TNC would significantly decrease patient's radiation dose. • Measurement of epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) volume and attenuation are feasible on virtual non-contrast (VNC) series with excellent correlation to true non-contrast series (all R<sup>2</sup>>0.9). • Differences in VNC algorithms have a significant impact on EAT volume and CT attenuation values. • A novel VNC algorithm (VNC<sub>PC</sub>) enables reliable assessment of EAT volume and attenuation with superior accuracy compared to measurements on conventional VNC- and CCTA-series.
Medical subject headings
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Angiography