Editorial Commentary: Coracoclavicular Joint Reconstruction for Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Double-Bundle Techniques Are Anatomically and Biomechanically Favored.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36603992.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.10.019.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
For coracoclavicular (CC) joint reconstruction in the setting of acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint Rockwood type III or V dislocations, flexible fixation shows better clinical outcomes and complication rates than rigid fixation. Single-bundle CC reconstruction reconstructs the conoid ligament but poorly controls anteroposterior stability and is nonanatomic in nature. Thus, we favor double-bundle CC reconstruction incorporating a trapezoid bundle, replicating the broad insertion of the CC ligaments. Biomechanical data confirm improved stability with double-bundle, flexible fixation reconstruction, especially with the lateral clavicular tunnel in a more posterolateral location. An early clinical outcome study supports the double-bundle approach; meticulous surgical technique is required to avoid double-trouble complication rates.
Medical subject headings
- Joint Dislocations
- Plastic Surgery Procedures
- Acromioclavicular Joint
- Arthroplasty, Replacement
Anatomy
- clavicle