Editorial Commentary: Platelet-Rich Plasma May Be Superior to Corticosteroid Injection for Rotator Cuff Disease Because of Improved Chance of Healing, Longer-Lasting Pain Relief, and No Detriment if Surgery Is Needed.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36604005.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2022.08.029.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Both corticosteroid and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have benefits for patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Currently, the published clinical differences are small, and statistical differences aren't as significant without a clinical difference, so the answer is personal. PRP is expensive, but rotator cuff healing is possible, resulting in the best chance to avoid surgery. And, if surgery is required, PRP results in no detriment, unlike corticosteroid. PRP may result in lasting pain relief. Based on the current literature, we prefer PRP despite the cost.
Medical subject headings
- Rotator Cuff Injuries
- Platelet-Rich Plasma
- Chronic Pain
Anatomy
- shoulder