Comparison Study of 5-Flap Z-Plasty and Double Z-Plasty for Interdigital Pocket Web Contractures.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36623947.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.11.011.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the improvement in abduction and change in web slope between 5-flap z-plasty and double z-plasty for post-burn or post-trauma interdigital pocket web contractures. We retrospectively reviewed 16 webs in 11 patients with post-burn or post-trauma interdigital pocket web contractures. Seven patients underwent 5-flap z-plasty and 4 double z-plasty. The abduction and slope angles of the affected fingers were measured before surgery and every 3 months after surgery. The follow-up time ranged from 12 to 36 months. The postoperative abduction angle improved in both groups. There was an increase of 19° ± 4° in the mean abduction angle after surgery in the 5-flap z-plasty group compared with a mean of 12° ± 2° in the double z-plasty group; the postoperative decrease in the web slope angle was 30° ± 5° and 22° ± 2°, respectively. All patients were able to actively move the affected webs and fingers with no pain or other discomfort. Five-flap z-plasty can be considered a better alternative to double z-plasty for interdigital pocket web contractures based on the improvement in abduction angle and changes in the slope angle. Therapeutic IV.
Medical subject headings
- Contracture
- Surgical Flaps