Comparison of proximal and distal involvement of upper extremity metastatic lesions: an analysis of 55 cases.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36624972.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934221146751.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We analysed the differences in clinical presentation between proximal (above elbow) and distal (below elbow) upper limb metastases in a retrospective review of patients presenting to our centre from 2011 to 2019. There were 55 cases, 64% involving the humerus and 62% occurring in men. The median age at the time of diagnosis was 64 years. Thirty-one per cent of the cases were proximal lesions. Distal upper limb metastases were more likely to be soft tissue lesions (71%) compared with proximal lesions (8%). The median age of patients with distal lesions was significantly lower at 58 years compared with 65 years for proximal lesions. Overall, non-small cell lung carcinoma was the most common primary malignancy (25%), however haematological cancers were most common in the distal group (29%). Distal upper limb metastases have distinct features that distinguish them from proximal lesions.<b>Level of evidence</b>: IV.
Medical subject headings
- Upper Extremity
- Elbow Joint
Anatomy
- humerus
- elbow