Propensity Scores: Confounder Adjustment When Comparing Nonrandomized Groups in Orthopaedic Surgery.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36639115.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arth.2022.08.030 and PMC identifier 10023476.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Many studies in arthroplasty research are based on nonrandomized, retrospective, registry-based cohorts. In these types of studies, patients belonging to different treatment or exposure groups often differ with respect to patient characteristics, medical histories, surgical indications, or other factors. Consequently, comparisons of nonrandomized groups are often subject to treatment selection bias and confounding. Propensity scores can be used to balance cohort characteristics, thus helping to minimize potential bias and confounding. This article explains how propensity scores are created and describes multiple ways in which they can be applied in the analysis of nonrandomized studies. Please visit the following (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sqgxl_nZWS4&t=3s) for a video that explains the highlights of the paper in practical terms.
Medical subject headings
- Orthopedic Procedures