Tumor volume definitions in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma - Comparing PET/MRI and histopathology.

Terzidis, Emmanouil; Friborg, Jeppe; Vogelius, Ivan R; Lelkaitis, Giedrius; von Buchwald, Christian; Olin, Anders B; Johannesen, Helle H; Fischer, Barbara M et al. · Radiother Oncol · 2023

prospective_cohort · Level II

Where this comes from

Abstract

In cancer treatment precise definition of the tumor volume is essential, but despite development in imaging modalities, this remains a challenge. Here, pathological tumor volumes from the surgical specimens were obtained and compared to tumor volumes defined from modern PET/MRI hybrid imaging. The purpose is to evaluate mismatch between the volumes defined from imaging and pathology was estimated and potential clinical impact. Twenty-five patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma were scanned on an integrated PET/MRI system prior to surgery. Three gross tumor volumes (GTVs) from the primary tumor site were delineated defined from MRI (GTV<sub>MRI</sub>), PET (GTV<sub>PET</sub>) and one by utilizing both anatomical images and clinical information (GTV<sub>ONCO</sub>). Twenty-five primary tumor specimens were extracted en bloc, scanned with PET/MRI and co-registered to the patient images. Each specimen was sectioned in blocks, sliced and stained with haematoxylin and eosin. All slices were digitalized and tumor delineated by a head and neck pathologist. The pathological tumor areas in all slices were interpolated yielding a pathological 3D tumor volume (GTV<sub>PATO</sub>). GTV<sub>PATO</sub>was compared with the imaging GTV's and potential mismatch was estimated. Thirteen patients were included. The mean volume of GTV<sub>ONCO</sub>was larger than the GTV's defined from PET or MRI. The mean mismatch of the GTV<sub>PATO</sub>compared to the GTV<sub>PET</sub>, GTV<sub>MRI</sub>and GTV<sub>ONCO</sub>was 31.9 %, 54.5 % and 27.9 % respectively, and the entire GTV<sub>PATO</sub> was only fully encompassed in GTV<sub>ONCO</sub> in 1 of 13 patients. However, after the addition of a clinical 5 mm margin the GTV<sub>PATO</sub> was fully encompassed in GTV<sub>ONCO</sub> in 11 out of 13 patients. Despite modern hybrid imaging modalities, a mismatch between imaging and pathological defined tumor volumes was observed in all patients.A 5 mm clinical margin was sufficient to ensure inclusion of the entire pathological volume in 11 out of 13 patients.

Medical subject headings