Aorta and tracheobronchial invasion in esophageal cancer: comparing diagnostic performance of 3.0-T MRI and CT.

Abstract

To compare between the diagnostic performance of 3.0-T MRI and CT for aorta and tracheobronchial invasion in patients with esophageal cancer (EC). We prospectively included patients with pathologically confirmed EC from November 2018 to June 2021, who had baseline stage of T3-4N0-2M0 and restaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced CT and MRI of the thorax. Two independent blinded radiologists scored image quality and the presence of invasion. Agreements between the two readers were calculated using kappa test. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predict value (PPV), and negative predict value (NPV) of MRI and CT in evaluating invasion were calculated. The net reclassification index (NRI) was used to evaluate the change in the number of patients correctly classified by MRI and CT. A total of 70 patients (64.8 ± 9.0 years; 53 men) were enrolled. Inter-reader agreements of image quality scores and presence of invasion by MRI and CT between the two readers were almost perfect (kappa > 0.80). The accuracy of MRI in evaluating thoracic aorta invasion was significantly higher than that of CT (reader 1: 90.0% vs. 71.4%; reader 2: 92.9% vs. 70.0%, respectively), and the accuracy of MRI in evaluating tracheobronchial invasion also was significantly higher than that of CT (reader 1: 92.9% vs. 72.9%; reader 2: 95.7% vs. 70.0%, respectively). NRI values were positive in both the evaluation of aorta and tracheobronchial invasion. The accuracy of 3-T MRI in determining thoracic aorta and tracheobronchial invasion is significantly higher than that of CT. • 3.0-T MRI was significantly more accurate than CT in assessing invasion of the thoracic aorta in patients with esophageal cancer. • 3.0-T MRI was also significantly more accurate than CT in assessing tracheobronchial invasion in patients with esophageal cancer. • 3.0-T MRI has a higher diagnostic performance than CT in evaluating patients with suspected aortic or tracheobronchial invasion in esophageal cancer.