The flexion-extension gap is predictive of patient-reported outcome measures after cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty.

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the association between the flexion-extension gap difference and patient-reported outcome measures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This was a retrospective case-control study of 60 cruciate-retaining single-radius TKAs. Soft tissue balancing was measured using an offset seesaw tensioner and centre-type digital knee balancer under joint distraction forces of 20-50 lbf and 1.5 times body mass index (1.5 BMI). At the last follow up of 2.0-6.5 (mean, 4.5) years postoperatively, patients were asked if they perceived their knee joint as 'natural' (26 knees) or 'artificial' (34 knees). Age, sex, and the flexion-extension gap were compared between the two groups. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine cut-off values of variables predictive of a natural joint perception. Natural joint perception was associated with a greater flexion-extension gap difference under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI (P = 0.016), higher knee function (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, P = 0.019), and quality of life (EuroQol 5-Dimension, P = 0.029). A gap difference of 0.95 mm under 1.5 BMI distraction predicted a natural joint perception post-TKA (sensitivity, 97.1%; specificity, 88.5%). Using a gap threshold of 1.0 mm under a 1.5 BMI distraction force yielded significant between-group differences in postoperative flexion (P = 0.040), satisfaction (P = 0.043), knee joint function (P < 0.001), quality of life (P = 0.032), and posterior femoral condylar offset (P = 0.037) CONCLUSION: A flexion-extension gap difference ≥1.0 mm under a distraction force of 1.5 BMI predicted superior outcomes, including patient satisfaction, after cruciate-retaining TKA. It was suggested that posterior femoral condylar offset could influence this finding.