Usefulness of MRI-Based Local Surveillance After Surgical Treatment of Musculoskeletal Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

<b>BACKGROUND.</b> The value of routine MRI follow-up after surgical treatment of musculoskeletal soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) is controversial. <b>OBJECTIVE.</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of MRI-based surveillance for musculoskeletal STS represented by the proportion of local recurrences (LRs) discovered by MRI versus clinically, stratified by imaging surveillance intensity; the characteristics of LRs detected on imaging versus clinically; and the impact of imaging surveillance on survival. <b>EVIDENCE ACQUISITION.</b> Multiple electronic databases were searched systematically for articles published through November 28, 2022, about controlled trials and cohort studies on the usefulness of MRI-based surveillance for musculoskeletal STS. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Random-effects meta-analyses of the proportion of LRs discovered by MRI as opposed to clinically were conducted. The association of low- versus high-intensity surveillance with the proportion of LR detected on MRI was assessed with a chi-square test of subgroup differences; for this latter assessment, high intensity was defined as at least one local surveillance imaging examination for low-risk tumors and at least three imaging examinations for high-risk tumors during the first 2 posttreatment years. <b>EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS.</b> A total of 4821 titles and abstracts were identified, and 19 studies were included. All studies were retrospective cohorts. There was substantial variability in follow-up approaches. The risk of bias was moderate in 32% and high in 68% of studies. The pooled proportion of LRs detected on MRI was 53% (95% CI, 36-71%) with high-intensity surveillance and 6% (95% CI, 3-9%) with low-intensity surveillance (<i>p</i> < .01). Comparison of LR characteristics (LR size, depth, grade, location, resection margins) detected on imaging versus clinically identified inconsistent results between studies. Trends toward better survival for imaging-detected LRs or more frequent imaging use were noted in four studies. <b>CONCLUSION.</b> When used at a high intensity, MRI-based surveillance can detect many clinically occult LRs, although the studies are small, occasionally yielded conflicting results, and are often of poor quality. A survival benefit could be associated with imaging use, but further research is needed to evaluate the causality of any observed survival differences. <b>CLINICAL IMPACT.</b> MRI-based surveillance after surgical treatment of musculoskeletal STS is useful to detect clinically occult LRs and could improve patient outcomes.