Comparison of Picosecond and Nanosecond Nd:YAG 1064-nm Lasers in the Treatment of Melasma: A Split-Face Randomized Clinical Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36729879.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009994.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Melasma is a refractory pigmentary disorder. The picosecond Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser (PSNY) has promise as a better treatment for melasma with few side effects and favorable therapeutic efficacy. The authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of PSNY and the nanosecond Q-switched Nd:YAG 1064-nm laser (QSNY) in patients with melasma. Eighteen patients were recruited to receive the two types of laser treatment on split faces. The modified Melasma Area Severity Index was assessed at baseline and the 3-month follow-up visit. The recurrence rate and the patients' self-satisfaction assessment were also evaluated. The two treated sides showed statistically significant decreases in modified Melasma Area Severity Index score after treatment at follow-up compared with baseline ( P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the modalities ( P = 0.873) or the patients' satisfaction assessment ( P = 0.287). The visual analogue scale pain assessment score showed that the QSNY was more painful than the PSNY counterpart ( P = 0.007). The recurrence rate was the same for the two treated sides (12.5%). PSNY is a better choice compared with QSNY with less treatment pain and postprocedure erythema as well as lower potential risk of exacerbation of melasma. Therapeutic, II.
Medical subject headings
- Melanosis
- Lasers, Solid-State