Coronal alignment classes after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty are not associated with variation in patient-reported outcome measurements: A single-center cohort study.
prospective_cohort · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36774917.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.knee.2023.01.015.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aims of this study were (1) to use three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT) measurements to determine whether patients undergoing imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) develop a variety of postoperative distal femoral mechanical angle (FMA), proximal tibial mechanical angle (TMA), and hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) phenotypes as described by Hirschmann et al, and (2) to compare postoperative patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) between these phenotypes. Fifty patients with knee osteoarthritis underwent RA-TKA. All surgeries were performed using bicruciate-stabilized TKA. In each case, the postoperative HKA, FMA and TMA were classified into one of Hirschmann's five FMA, five TMA, and seven HKA phenotype categories. We investigated how these phenotypes affected patient satisfaction, 2011 Knee Society Score (KSS) subscale scores, the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12) score, and patella scores with anterior knee pain at a mean of 15.1 months after RA-TKA. Coronal alignment angles were assigned to three FMA, four TMA, and five HKA phenotypes. The most common FMA, TMA, and HKA phenotypes were valgus FMA 3° (58%), valgus TMA 3° (60%), and varus HKA 3° (38%). The FMA, TMA, and HKA phenotypes showed no significant differences in any PROMs. RA-TKA led to various HKA, FMA and TMA phenotypes in the coronal plane, none of which affected PROMs.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Robotic Surgical Procedures
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anatomy
- knee
- tibia