General Anesthesia Compared With Non-GA in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 36797071.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207066 and PMC identifier 10115505.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques. A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, <i>p</i> = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, <i>p</i> = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality. In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.
Medical subject headings
- Brain Ischemia
- Stroke
- Ischemic Stroke
- Endovascular Procedures