Synthetic Mid-urethral Sling for the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Women With Neurogenic Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction: A Multicentric Retrospective Study.

Abstract

We assess the efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for failure of synthetic mid-urethral slings for the treatment of urinary incontinence in a large cohort of women with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction. Women aged 18 years or older who received a synthetic mid-urethral sling for stress urinary incontinence or mixed urinary incontinence in 3 centers between 2004 and 2019 and who had a neurological disorder were included. Exclusion criteria were less than 1 year of follow-up, concomitant pelvic organ prolapse repair, previous synthetic sling implantation, and no baseline urodynamics. The primary outcome was surgical failure, defined as recurrence of stress urinary incontinence during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the 5-year failure rate. Adjusted Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify factors associated with surgical failure. Complications and reoperations during the follow-up have also been reported. A total of 115 women with a median age of 53 years were included<b>.</b> The median follow-up duration was 75 months. The 5-year failure rate was 48% (95 CI 46%-57%). Age above 50 years, negative tension-free vaginal tape test and transobturator route were associated with surgical failure. Thirty-six patients (31.3%) underwent at least 1 reoperation for complications or failure, and 2 required definitive intermittent catheterization. Synthetic mid-urethral slings may be an acceptable alternative to autologous slings or artificial urinary sphincters for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in a selected group of patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction.