Bioadhesive patch as a parenchymal sparing treatment of acute traumatic pulmonary air leaks.

Abstract

Traumatic pulmonary injuries are common in chest trauma. Persistent air leaks occur in up to 46% of patients depending on injury severity. Prolonged leaks are associated with increased morbidity and cost. Prior work from our first-generation pectin patches successfully sealed pulmonary leaks in a cadaveric swine model. We now test the next-generation pectin patch against wedge resection in the management of air leaks in anesthetized swine. A continuous air leak of 10% to 20% percent was created to the anterior surface of the lung in intubated and sedated swine. Animals were treated with a two-ply pectin patch or stapled wedge resection (SW). Tidal volumes (TVs) were recorded preinjury and postinjury. Following repair, TVs were recorded, a chest tube was placed, and animals were observed for presence air leak at closure and for an additional 90 minutes while on positive pressure ventilation. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher's exact test used to compare continuous and categorical data between groups. Thirty-one animals underwent either SW (15) or pectin patch repair (PPR, 16). Baseline characteristics were similar between animals excepting baseline TV (SW, 10.3 mL/kg vs. PPR, 10.9 mL/kg; p = 0.03). There was no difference between groups for severity of injury based on percent of TV loss (SW, 15% vs. PPR, 14%; p = 0.5). There was no difference in TV between groups following repair (SW, 10.2 mL/kg vs. PPR, 10.2 mL/kg; p = 1) or at the end of observation (SW, 9.8 mL/kg vs. PPR, 10.2 mL/kg; p = 0.4). One-chamber intermittent air leaks were observed in three of the PPR animals, versus one in the SW group ( p = 0.6). Pectin patches effectively sealed the lung following injury and were noninferior when compared with wedge resection for the management of acute traumatic air leaks. Pectin patches may offer a parenchymal sparing option for managing such injuries, although studies evaluating biodurability are needed.