A biomechanical comparison between robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in resection accuracy: a meta-analysis on cadaveric specimens.

Abstract

Robotic total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has seen a rapid increase in utilization with recent literature suggesting that implant accuracy and resection are better optimized than in conventional TKA. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA in minimizing biplanar femoral and tibial resection error in cadaveric specimens. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching through PubMed, Cochrane library, and Embase to identify studies that analyzed the biomechanical properties of robotic assisted and conventional TKA, according to standard PRISMA guidelines. Evaluated outcomes included femoral coronal resection error (deg), femoral sagittal resection error (deg), tibial coronal resection error (deg), and tibial sagittal resection error (deg). Seven studies met inclusion criteria, including a total of 140 cadaveric specimens (robotic: 70, conventional: 70), for resection accuracy between robotic and conventional TKA. Pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in femoral coronal and sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems (p < 0.001 & p < 0.001, respectively). The pooled analysis from seven studies revealed a significant difference in tibial sagittal resection error in favor of robotic systems compared to conventional systems following TKA (p = 0.012). Posthoc power analysis revealed a power of 87.2%. The use of robotic TKA is associated with lower femoral coronal, lower femoral sagittal and tibial sagittal resection error compared to conventional TKA. It should be noted that these findings are purely biomechanical - surgeons should interpret these findings along with clinical differences between conventional and robotic systems to determine which system is best for each patient.