BERT-based Transfer Learning in Sentence-level Anatomic Classification of Free-Text Radiology Reports.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37035437.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1148/ryai.220097 and PMC identifier 10077075.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To assess whether transfer learning with a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT) model, pretrained on a clinical corpus, can perform sentence-level anatomic classification of free-text radiology reports, even for anatomic classes with few positive examples. This retrospective study included radiology reports of patients who underwent whole-body PET/CT imaging from December 2005 to December 2020. Each sentence in these reports (6272 sentences) was labeled by two annotators according to body part ("brain," "head & neck," "chest," "abdomen," "limbs," "spine," or "others"). The BERT-based transfer learning approach was compared with two baseline machine learning approaches: bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) and the count-based method. Area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) were computed for each approach, and AUCs were compared using the DeLong test. The BERT-based approach achieved a macro-averaged AUPRC of 0.88 for classification, outperforming the baselines. AUC results for BERT were significantly higher than those of BiLSTM for all classes and those of the count-based method for the "brain," "chest," "abdomen," and "others" classes (<i>P</i> values < .025). AUPRC results for BERT were superior to those of baselines even for classes with few labeled training data (brain: BERT, 0.95, BiLSTM, 0.11, count based, 0.41; limbs: BERT, 0.74, BiLSTM, 0.28, count based, 0.46; spine: BERT, 0.82, BiLSTM, 0.53, count based, 0.69). The BERT-based transfer learning approach outperformed the BiLSTM and count-based approaches in sentence-level anatomic classification of free-text radiology reports, even for anatomic classes with few labeled training data.<b>Keywords:</b> Anatomy, Comparative Studies, Technology Assessment, Transfer Learning <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © RSNA, 2023.