Deconstructive versus reconstructive approach to internal carotid artery blowout in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A tertiary center experience and systematic review.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of parent artery occlusion (PAO) versus stent-assisted reconstruction in radiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with internal carotid artery (ICA) blowouts. A retrospective review from our institution (2011-2021) and systematic review of Pubmed and Embase (1995-2022) was performed. Twenty-eight eligible studies were identified. Eighty-six PAOs and 37 stent-assisted reconstructions were analyzed, including 11 PAOs and 5 stents from our institution. Stents were associated with significantly higher incidence of overall re-bleeding (16.2% [95% CI 7.4-31.9] vs. 4.6% [95% CI 1.3-13.5], p = 0.047), delayed stroke (5.4% [95% CI 1.3-19.4] vs. 0%, p = 0.034) and reduced median survival (7.1 [95% CI 3.8-14.0] months vs. 29.0 [95% CI 9.4-63.4] months, p = 0.017) compared to PAO. There were no significant differences in terms of overall stroke, infection, extruded/migrated foreign body, and peri-procedure death. PAO is preferred over reconstructive treatment in patients with adequate collateral circulation.