Real-Time Intubation and Ventilation Feedback: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37038898.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1542/peds.2022-059839.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the best educational application of a respiratory function monitor and a video laryngoscope. This study was a randomized controlled simulation-based trial, including 167 medical students. Participants had to execute ventilation and intubation maneuvers on a newborn manikin. Participants were randomized into 3 groups. In group A (no-access), the feedback devices were not visible but recording. In group B (supervisor-access), the feedback devices were visible to the supervisor only. In group C (full-access), both the participant and the supervisor had visual access. The two main outcome variables were the percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (4-8mL/kg) and the number of intubation attempts. Group C achieved the highest percentage of ventilations within the tidal volume target range (full-access 63.6%, supervisor-access 51.0%, no-access 31.1%, P < .001) and the lowest mask leakage (full-access 34.9%, supervisor-access 46.6%, no-access 61.6%; A to B: P < .001, A to C: P < .001, B to C: P = .003). Overall, group C achieved superior ventilation quality regarding primary and secondary outcome measures. The number of intubation attempts until success was lowest in the full-access group (full-access: 1.29, supervisor-access: 1.77, no-access: 2.43; A to B: P = .001, A to C: P < .001, B to C: P = .015). Our findings confirm that direct visual access to feedback devices for supervisor and trainees alike considerably benefits outcomes and can contribute to the future of clinical education.
Medical subject headings
- Intubation, Intratracheal
- Laryngoscopes