A thoracoscopic anterior approach to the spine for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis does not have a detrimental effect on pulmonary function at 2 years compared to posterior-only surgery.

Abstract

This study aims to examine pulmonary function outcomes in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) undergoing posterior spinal fusion (PSF) with an anterior thoracoscopic release compared to those undergoing PSF alone. A retrospective review of patients with AIS over a 9-year period at a single institution compared 2 groups: PSF with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (PSF/VATS) and patients undergoing a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) alone. Standard radiographs and Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV₁) and Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) were obtained preoperatively and at regular follow up periods up to 2-year post-operatively. Within group and between-group comparisons were performed. There were 110 patients in the study: 12 in the PSF/VATS cohort and 98 in the PSF only cohort. The PSF/VATS group were younger (12.6 vs. 14.6, p = 0.003) and had larger coronal curves (80.8° vs. 60.7°, p = 0.001), and worse preoperative FVC (64.7% vs. 79.6%, p = 0.018) and FEV₁ (62.3% vs. 77.6%, p = 0.003). At 2 years, the percent coronal Cobb correction was greater in the PSF/VATS group (67.9% vs. 48.4%, p < 0.001) with greater improvement in thoracic height (32.8 mm vs. 20.7 mm, p = 0.028). While the 2-year PFTs were the same for FEV₁% (75.8% vs. 81.8%, p = 0.368) and FVC% (77.3% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.562), there was greater percent improvement over the 2 years in the PSF/VATS cohort: FEV₁% (13.5% vs. 4.2%, p = 0.082) and FVC% (12.7% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.112). AIS patients who have a VATS approach in addition to PSF have greater coronal plane correction and improved pulmonary function compared to PSF alone despite more severe spinal deformity and worse baseline pulmonary function.