Delayed in diagnosis of upper aerodigestive tract cancers: A comprehensive review of medical malpractice cases.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37144329.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.27390.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Factors that prompt litigation and influence outcomes for malpractice cases involving cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract are incompletely described. Westlaw, a national legal database, was searched for medical malpractice claims related to upper aerodigestive tract cancer for all years available. Of the 122 cases meeting inclusion criteria, 106 (86.9%) involved allegations of failure to diagnose or delay in diagnosis. Tongue, larynx, and nasopharynx cancers were more frequently litigated than would be expected based on their incidence (tongue, 38.7% of aerodigestive tract litigation vs. 26.9% of aerodigestive tract cancers; larynx, 33.0% vs. 22.3%; nasopharynx, 10.4% vs. 4.6%). Payouts were made in over half of diagnosis failure lawsuits (56.6%), which carried an average award of $2840690 [IQR 850219-2537509]. An awareness of litigation on cancers of the upper aerodigestive tract holds the potential to improve patient care and help otolaryngologists avoid potential risks for litigation.
Medical subject headings
- Malpractice
- Neoplasms