Clinical profile and outcome of isolated pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37152363.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101973 and PMC identifier 10154961.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Isolated pulmonary embolism (PE) appears to be associated with a specific clinical profile and sequelae compared to deep vein thrombosis (DVT)-associated PE. The objective of this study was to identify clinical characteristics that discriminate both phenotypes, and to characterize their differences in clinical outcome. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing PE phenotypes. A systematic search of the electronic databases PubMed and CENTRAL was conducted, from inception until January 27, 2023. Exclusion criteria were irrelevant content, inability to retrieve the article, language other than English or German, the article comprising a review or case study/series, and inappropriate study design. Data on risk factors, clinical characteristics and clinical endpoints were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses. Fifty studies with 435,768 PE patients were included. In low risk of bias studies, 30% [95% CI 19-42%, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 97%] of PE were isolated. The Factor V Leiden [OR: 0.47, 95% CI 0.37-0.58, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%] and prothrombin G20210A mutations [OR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.41-0.75, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%] were significantly less prevalent among patients with isolated PE. Female sex [OR: 1.30, 95% CI 1.17-1.45, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 79%], recent invasive surgery [OR: 1.31, 95% CI 1.23-1.41, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 65%], a history of myocardial infarction [OR: 2.07, 95% CI 1.85-2.32, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%], left-sided heart failure [OR: 1.70, 95% CI 1.37-2.10, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 76%], peripheral artery disease [OR: 1.36, 95% CI 1.31-1.42, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%] and diabetes mellitus [OR: 1.23, 95% CI 1.21-1.25, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%] were significantly more frequently represented among isolated PE patients. In a synthesis of clinical outcome data, the risk of recurrent VTE in isolated PE was half that of DVT-associated PE [RR: 0.55, 95% CI 0.44-0.69, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%], while the risk of arterial thrombosis was nearly 3-fold higher [RR: 2.93, 95% CI 1.43-6.02, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%]. Our findings suggest that isolated PE appears to be a specific entity that may signal a long-term risk of arterial thrombosis. Randomised controlled trials are necessary to establish whether alternative treatment regimens are beneficial for this patient subgroup. None.