Retrospective analysis of the application of percutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37201595.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107547.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
After the stimulation of neurodermis, in the first stage, the relevant literature of each stage can be obtained through the relevant computer detection method. At the same time, also to the relevant database and scientific network research, and the influence of TENS tight comparison, the investigation is two years, using a series of score evaluation into the quality of the literature, in the process of inclusion if a certain funnel diagram analysis, the analysis results will be expressed according to the forest diagram, can get the final results in the review of many types of research, and then according to different types of research, delete the content of duplicate related reading topics. After reading the full text, if the content meets the inclusion criteria, it will show no significant difference between the effect of the control group and the pain effect of the experimental group, but the time of delivery is shorter than that of the control group, the pain intensity of TENS will decrease, thus shortening the labor time of each period.
Medical subject headings
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation