Broken Machines or Active Bodies? Part 2. How People Talk About Osteoarthritis and Why Clinicians Need to Change the Conversation.
systematic_review · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37259542.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2519/jospt.2023.11880.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<b>SYNOPSIS:</b> How people talk about osteoarthritis may impact outcomes, including uptake of guideline recommendations related to activity-based lifestyles and interventions. In this editorial, we describe 2 key ways of talking, based on findings from our systematic review of 62 qualitative studies exploring the perceptions of people with knee osteoarthritis (n = 1208), their carers (n = 28), and clinicians (n = 2403). Among raw quotes extracted from the studies, we observed a dominant impairment-based way of talking and a participatory based way of talking. These ways of talking form a novel framework to help clinicians understand what people think and do about osteoarthritis. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(6):325-330. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11880</i>.
Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
Anatomy
- knee