How much food tracking during a digital weight-management program is enough to produce clinically significant weight loss?
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37271576.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/oby.23795.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify the levels of food-tracking adherence that best predict ≥3%, ≥5%, and ≥10% weight loss at 6 months and to identify distinctive food-tracking trajectories among participants in a 6-month, commercial digital weight-management program. This study used data from 153 participants of a single-arm trial of a commercial digital weight-management program, WeightWatchers (WW). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to identify the optimum thresholds of food tracking that can predict ≥3%, ≥5%, and ≥10% weight loss at 6 months. Time series clustering analysis was performed on weekly food-tracking data to identify trajectories and compare trajectories on weight loss at 6 months. ROC analyses showed that the optimum thresholds of food tracking were 28.5% of the intervention days to achieve ≥3% weight loss (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.820, p < 0.001), 39.4% to achieve ≥5% weight loss (AUC = 0.744, p < 0.001), and 67.1% to achieve 10% weight loss (AUC = 0.712, p = 0.002). Time series clustering analyses found three food-tracking trajectories. Trajectories differed significantly in weight loss at 6 months (F = 14.1, p < 0.001). Results suggest that perfect food-tracking adherence is not necessary to achieve clinically significant weight loss.
Medical subject headings
- Weight Reduction Programs