Clinical use of remdesivir in COVID-19 treatment: a retrospective cohort study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37295834.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070489 and PMC identifier 10276957.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This study investigated remdesivir's clinical use to provide direct evidence of effectiveness for a low-middle income Asian setting. A one-to-one propensity score matching retrospective cohort study. A tertiary hospital with COVID-19 treatment facilities in Vietnam. A total of 310 patients in standard of care (SoC) group were matched with 310 patients in SoC+remdesivir (SoC+R) group. The primary outcome was time to critical progression, defined as all-cause mortality or critical illness. The secondary outcomes were length of oxygen therapy/ventilation and need for invasive mechanical ventilation. Outcome reports were presented as HR, OR or effect difference with 95% CI. Patients receiving remdesivir had a lower risk for mortality or critical illness (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.96, p=0.030). Remdesivir was not associated with a shorter length of oxygen therapy/ventilation (effect difference -0.17 days, 95% CI -1.29 to 0.96, p=0.774). The need for invasive mechanical ventilation was lower in SoC+R group (OR=0.57, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.86, p=0.007). This study's results showing remdesivir's benefits in non-critical patients with COVID-19 may be extrapolated to other similar low-middle income countries, allowing more regimens for limited resource areas and reducing poor outcomes and equity gap worldwide.
Medical subject headings
- COVID-19