[<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI in children suffering from lymphoma: does MRI contrast media make a difference?
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37338559.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00330-023-09840-5 and PMC identifier 10598113.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Evaluate the influence of an MRI contrast agent application on primary and follow-up staging in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma using [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI to avoid adverse effects and save time and costs during examination. A total of 105 [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI datasets were included for data evaluation. Two different reading protocols were analyzed by two experienced readers in consensus, including for PET/MRI-1 reading protocol unenhanced T2w and/or T1w imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET imaging and for PET/MRI-2 reading protocol an additional T1w post contrast imaging. Patient-based and region-based evaluation according to the revised International Pediatric Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL) Staging System (IPNHLSS) was performed, and a modified standard of reference was applied comprising histopathology and previous and follow-up cross-sectional imaging. Differences in staging accuracy were assessed using the Wilcoxon and McNemar tests. In patient-based analysis, PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 both determined a correct IPNHLSS tumor stage in 90/105 (86%) exams. Region-based analysis correctly identified 119/127 (94%) lymphoma-affected regions. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2 were 94%, 97%, 90%, 99%, 97%, respectively. There were no significant differences between PET/MRI-1 and PET/MRI-2. The use of MRI contrast agents in [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI examinations has no beneficial effect in primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients. Therefore, switching to a contrast agent-free [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI protocol should be considered in all pediatric lymphoma patients. This study gives a scientific baseline switching to a contrast agent-free [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI staging in pediatric lymphoma patients. This could avoid side effects of contrast agents and saves time and costs by a faster staging protocol for pediatric patients. • No additional diagnostic benefit of MRI contrast agents at [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI examinations of pediatric lymphoma primary and follow-up staging • Highly accurate primary and follow-up staging of pediatric lymphoma patients at MRI contrast-free [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/MRI.
Medical subject headings
- Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
- Lymphoma