Using AI Tools in Writing Peer Review Reports: Should Academic Journals Embrace the Use of ChatGPT?
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37368125.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s10439-023-03299-7.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This letter highlights a pressing issue regarding the absence of established editorial policies for the utilization of AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) in the peer review process. The increasing adoption of AI tools in academic publishing necessitates the formulation of standardized guidelines to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability. Without clear editorial policies, there is a threat of compromising the integrity of the peer review process and undermining the credibility of academic publications. Urgent attention is needed to address this gap and establish robust protocols that govern the use of AI tools in peer review.
Medical subject headings
- Biomedical Research
- Periodicals as Topic