Sustainment of continuous pulse oximetry deimplementation: Analysis of Eliminating Monitor Overuse study data from six hospitals.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37380625.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jhm.13154 and PMC identifier 10527429.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Using continuous pulse oximetry (cSpO<sub>2</sub> ) to monitor children with bronchiolitis who are not receiving supplemental oxygen is a form of medical overuse. In this longitudinal analysis from the Eliminating Monitor Overuse (EMO) study, we aimed to assess changes in cSpO<sub>2</sub> overuse before, during, and after intensive cSpO<sub>2</sub> -deimplementation efforts in six hospitals. Monitoring data were collected during three phases: "P1" baseline, "P2" active deimplementation (all sites engaged in education and audit and feedback strategies), and "P3" sustainment (a new baseline measured after strategies were withdrawn). Two thousand and fifty-three observations were analyzed. We found that each hospital experienced reductions during active deimplementation (P2), with overall adjusted cSpO<sub>2</sub> overuse decreasing from 53%, 95% confidence interval (CI): (49-57) to 22%, 95% CI: (19-25) between P1 and P2. However, following the withdrawal of deimplementation strategies, overuse rebounded in all six sites, with overall adjusted cSpO<sub>2</sub> overuse increasing to 37%, 95% CI: (33-41) in P3.
Medical subject headings
- Oximetry
- Bronchiolitis