Forces and energetics of the canonical tetrameric cation channel gating.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37399394.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1073/pnas.2221616120 and PMC identifier 10334803.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
The canonical gating mechanism of tetrameric cation channels involves the spreading of the pore-lining helices at the so-called bundle-crossing gate. Despite a wealth of structural information, we lack a physical description of the gating process. Here, I took advantage of an entropic polymer stretching physical model and MthK structures to derive the forces and energies involved in pore-domain gating. In MthK, the Ca<sup>2+</sup>-induced conformational change in the RCK domain alone opens the bundle-crossing gate through pulling via unfolded linkers. In the open conformation, the linkers serve as entropic springs between the RCK domain and bundle-crossing gate that store an elastic potential energy of 3.6<i>k</i><sub>B</sub>T and exert 9.8 pN (piconewton) radial pulling force to keep the gate open. I further derive that the work to load the linkers to prime the channel for opening is up to 3.8<i>k</i><sub>B</sub>T, exerting up to 15.5 pN to pull the bundle-crossing open. Opening of the bundle-crossing leads to a release of 3.3<i>k</i><sub>B</sub>T spring potential energy. Thus, the closed/RCK-apo and the open/RCK-Ca<sup>2+</sup> conformations are separated by a barrier of several <i>k</i><sub>B</sub>T. I discuss how these findings relate to the functional properties of MthK and suggest that given the architectural conservation of the helix-pore-loop-helix pore-domain among all tetrameric cation channels, these physical parameters might be quite general.
Medical subject headings
- Protein Structure, Secondary