Evaluation of clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach in thoracic disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, complication rate, feasibility, and applicability of transfacet pedicle-sparing approach for treating thoracic disc herniation. We searched three databases including the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase for eligible studies until Dec 2022. The quality of studies and their risk of bias were assessed using the methodological index for non-randomized studies. We evaluated the heterogeneity between studies using the I² statistic and the P-value for the heterogeneity. A total of 328 patients described in 11 included articles were published from 2009 to 2022. Pain outcomes using the visual analog scale (VAS score) were reported in four studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.749 (CI 95% 0.555-0.943). The obtained result showed the positive effect of the procedure and the improvement of patients' pain after the surgery. Myelopathy outcomes using the Nurick score were reported in five studies. The standardized mean difference was reported as 0.775 (CI 95% 0.479-1.071). The result showed the positive effect of the procedure. Eight studies assessed postoperative complications and neurological deterioration. The pooled overall complication was 12.4% (32/258) and 3.5% (9/258) neurological worsening. The results of this study demonstrated a positive effect of the transfacet pedicle-sparing approach on the clinical outcomes of patients with thoracic disc herniation surgery. The technique has been shown to be safe and effective for the right patient. The technique is associated with lower rates of complications and a shorter hospital stay compared to other surgical approaches. This information can assist clinicians in making informed decisions when selecting the most appropriate surgical technique for their patients with thoracic disc herniation.