Questions, answers and challenges: Summarising the guidance for distal radius fractures.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 37492109.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jor.2023.07.007 and PMC identifier 10365928.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This article summarises the current recommendations from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA), the British Society for Surgery of the Hand (BSSH) and the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for the management of distal radius fractures (DRF). We performed an audit of DRF management at our local emergency hospital. Results and conclusion: Despite DRF representing a large portion of our workload, there remains a paucity of evidence to base recommendations on. Recommendations can be conflicting, and some seem aspirational rather than achievable. Our local audit highlights the challenges of putting guidelines into practice. Treatment plans should incorporate best practice guidance but ultimately be individualised to each patient.
Anatomy
- radius